Reforming Key Stage 4 qualifications

With the recent controversy over GCSE grading and Government’s bold announcement of its intention to replace GCSEs in England, it would be easy to assume that the proposals are all wrapped up, when in fact, they still only at the consultation stage.

Through its proposals the Government plans to restore what is describes as, “rigour and confidence to our examination system”, with the introduction of English Baccalaureate Certificates in English, maths, sciences, history, geography and languages.  It’s seeking the views of schools, colleges, universities, employers, curriculum and assessment experts, and the general public on how qualifications can support all young people to have high aspirations, and the, “best possible opportunities” to progress to further and higher education and into employment. 

The proposals have provoked strong reactions on all sides, ranging from those who think the changes would take us back to a ‘bygone age’ and are driven solely by ideology, to those who think the changes do not go far enough.  Most recently, there has been criticism that non-EBacc subjects are being squeezed in the curriculum, and even more strongly worded opposition from the leader of one teaching union who has labelled the plans a “disaster”.

There are also those who have questioned the whole idea of an exam at age 16, believing a better balance of skills and knowledge is needed.  Among them the CBI, who has commented:

“Though an examination system should engage and stretch young people, there is a wider debate to be had, beyond the nature and function of exams at 16, focused on the outcomes society expects of our education system to deliver between the ages of 14 and 18.”

CBI will be publishing its own proposals later in the year.

Responses to the Government’s consultation can be made here.  The deadline is 10 December 2012.

Tags: CBI, DfE, EBacc, GCSE, Key Stage 4, Qualifications